Rekonstruksi TIM Manajemen Madrasah: Inovasi Kepemimpinan Mutu di MAN 2 Yogyakarta
Keywords:
Kepemimpinan; Mutu Pendidikan; Manajemen Madrasah; Unit KeagamaanAbstract
The quality of madrasah education is determined not only by academic achievement but also by the institution’s ability to integrate religious values, character development, and sustainable governance. In this context, madrasah principal leadership plays a strategic role in developing a collaborative and responsive quality assurance system that reflects the distinctive characteristics of Islamic educational institutions. This study aims to analyze the reconstruction of the Madrasah Management Team as an innovation in quality leadership at MAN 2 Yogyakarta, particularly through the integration of the Head of the Religious Affairs Unit, whose position is equivalent to that of the vice principals. This study employed a qualitative approach with a case study design. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, observations, and documentation involving the madrasah principal, vice principals for curriculum, student affairs, facilities and infrastructure, public relations, and the Head of the Religious Affairs Unit. Data were analyzed through data condensation, data display, and conclusion drawing and verification, while data credibility was strengthened through source and technique triangulation. The findings indicate that the reconstruction of the Madrasah Management Team has fostered a more collaborative and distributed leadership pattern. Integrating the Head of the Religious Affairs Unit into the management team strengthens the strategic position of religious dimensions within the quality assurance system rather than treating them merely as religious program activities. The study concludes that quality leadership innovation can be achieved through reconstructing organizational structures, roles, and working relationships, thereby strengthening a madrasah quality culture that integrates academic, managerial, character, and religious dimensions.
References
Bellibas, M. Ş., Gümüş, S., & Liu, Y. (2021). Does school leadership matter for teachers' classroom practice? The influence of instructional leadership and distributed leadership on instructional quality. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 32(3), 387–412.
Bush, T. (2020). Theories of educational leadership and management (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Carbone, A., Evans, J., Ross, B., Drew, S., Phelan, L., Lindsay, K., Cottman, C., Stoney, S., & Ye, J. (2017). Assessing distributed leadership for learning and teaching quality: A multi-institutional study. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 39(2), 183–196.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Deming, W. E. (1986). Out of the crisis. MIT Press.
Diamond, J. B., & Spillane, J. P. (2016). School leadership and management from a distributed perspective: A 2016 retrospective and prospective. Management in Education, 30(4), 147–154.
Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). Teachers College Press.
Harris, A. (2004). Distributed leadership and school improvement: Leading or misleading? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 32(1), 11–24.
Heck, R. H., & Hallinger, P. (2009). Assessing the contribution of distributed leadership to school improvement and growth in math achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 46(3), 659–689.
Kementerian Agama Republik Indonesia. (2024). Keputusan Menteri Agama Republik Indonesia Nomor 450 Tahun 2024 tentang Pedoman Implementasi Kurikulum pada Raudhatul Athfal, Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, Madrasah Tsanawiyah, Madrasah Aliyah, dan Madrasah Aliyah Kejuruan.
Larsson, P., & Löwstedt, J. (2023). Distributed school leadership: Making sense of the educational infrastructure. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 51(1), 138–156.
Louis, K. S., Mayrowetz, D., Murphy, J., & Smylie, M. (2013). Making sense of distributed leadership: How secondary school educators look at job redesign. International Journal of Educational Leadership and Management, 1(1), 33–68.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Nurhasanah, A., Khansa, N. A., Munawwaroh, S. M., Arfinanti, N., & Sandani, A. (2024). Peran sistem penjaminan mutu pendidikan dalam mewujudkan visi misi madrasah. Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen dan Pendidikan, 4(2), 99–106. https://doi.org/10.30872/jimpian.v4i2.2949
Sallis, E. (2014). Total quality management in education (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Spillane, J. P., & Healey, K. (2010). Conceptualizing school leadership and management from a distributed perspective. The Elementary School Journal, 111(2), 253–281.
Spillane, J. P., Morel, R. P., & Al-Fadala, A. (2019). Educational leadership: A multilevel distributed perspective. Qatar Foundation/World Innovation Summit for Education.
Tejeiro, F. (2024). Distributed leadership and inclusive schools. International Journal of Educational Leadership and Management, 12(1), 36–56.
Yang, W., & Lim, S. (2023). Toward distributed pedagogical leadership for quality improvement: Evidence from a childcare centre in Singapore. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 51(2), 289–307.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
